Asana vs Jira: which tool should you choose for your projects in 2025?
In the jungle of project management tools, two names keep coming up: Asana and Jira. And with good reason: one is favoured by marketing, product or operations teams for its ease of use, while the other is a must-have for agile developers for its technical rigour and customisation power.
But which one is really for you?
👉 If you're hesitating between these two giants, it's probably because they don't address the same teams or the same needs:
- Asana focuses on visibility, collaboration and fluidity;
- Jira, developed by Atlassian, shines in technical, structured and complex environments, with a focus on sprints, workflows and advanced reporting.
In this comparative guide, we take a close look at the features, pricing, interface, integrations and use cases to help you make the right choice for your organisation, your working method and, above all, your priorities.
What is Asana?
Overview of Asana
Asana has become one of the world's leading project management tools. Its promise: to provide an intuitive platform for organising, monitoring and steering team work, without the need to be a seasoned project manager.
Used by teams of all sizes, from start-ups to major corporations, Asana has established itself as a benchmark for non-tech teams: marketing, HR, product, design, etc., but it remains perfectly capable of supporting more complex workflows in agile environments.
Asana's main features
Before you can judge whether Asana is right for you, you need to understand what it actually offers. Here's an overview of the key features that make Asana a comprehensive management tool that many organisations value:
- project and task management: project creation, sub-tasks, dependencies, deadlines, priorities ;
- multiple views: list, Kanban, calendar, timeline (Gantt type), workflow, etc;
- automation: conditional rules for automatically assigning, notifying and moving tasks;
- forms: for centralising internal or external requests;
- dashboards and reporting: visualise workload, progress and bottlenecks;
- native integrations: Slack, Zoom, Google Workspace, Microsoft Teams, Salesforce, Notion, Zapier, etc. ;
- collaboration: comments, mentions, management of roles and permissions, notifications, etc;
- integrated AI (beta): task suggestions, summary generation, intelligent classification.
Asana
Advantages and disadvantages of Asana
Asana is a robust tool, but like all management software, it's not universal. To find out if it's right for you, let's take a look at what its users like and dislike.
✅ It's in fast-paced, collaborative and structured environments that Asana really comes into its own. Here's what stands out most in customer reviews:
- A clear, fluid interface that's easy to learn, even for beginners;
- multiple views to suit every user: list, Kanban, calendar, Gantt, etc;
- powerful automations that are easy to deploy without coding
- effective real-time collaboration thanks to comments, mentions and shared tasks;
- extensive integration with the tools most used by teams;
- visual project tracking, with easy-to-configure dashboards.
❌ Despite its power, Asana can show its limitations in certain contexts, particularly technical or highly customised:
- no native documentation management (unlike Notion or Confluence) ;
- less suited to development teams, particularly for sprints or fine-grained ticket management ;
- little advanced customisation of statuses or workflows compared with Jira ;
- limited free plan: no automation, no reporting
- prices rise quickly if you have several teams or parallel projects.
What is Jira?
Overview of Jira
Developed by Atlassian, Jira is a project management tool initially designed for software development teams. Today, it has become a benchmark in the agile world, used in thousands of tech companies around the world.
With Jira, we're not just talking about task management, but customisable workflows, agile sprints, technical reporting and backlog management. It's a tool designed for IT teams, devs, product managers and scrum masters, but it can also be adapted for cross-functional use, notably via Jira Work Management.
Jira's main features
Before diving into the comparison, let's take a look at what Jira offers in its 'standard' version. There's no marketing overlay here: it's solid, structured and technical. Here's what you'll find in this agile development and execution-oriented management tool:
- ticket management: creation, assignment, prioritisation, status tracking ;
- integrated agile methods: management of sprints, backlogs, burndown charts, epics, story points, etc;
- Kanban and Scrum boards: can be customised to suit each technical team;
- advanced workflows: fully modifiable, with conditional transitions and validations;
- automations: powerful and configurable for any type of scenario;
- agile reporting: graphs, velocity reports, activity logs, resolution cycles, etc;
- native integrations: Bitbucket, GitHub, Confluence, Slack, Zoom, Figma, etc. ;
- add-ons via Atlassian Marketplace: over 3,000 apps to extend capabilities.
Jira
Advantages and disadvantages of Jira
Jira is a bit like a Swiss Army knife: extremely powerful... but sometimes intimidating. To find out if it's the right tool for you, let's take a look at some of the most common user feedback.
✅ Jira is a benchmark tool for managing complex technical projects. Here's why so many dev and product teams choose it:
- perfect for agile teams: sprints, backlog, epics, story points natively integrated ;
- ultra-customisable workflows: fine-tuned to internal processes;
- rich agile reporting: burndown, cycle time, velocity, etc. ;
- powerful Atlassian ecosystem: Jira + Confluence + Bitbucket = complete management stack;
- infinitely extensible via add-on modules and a robust API;
- ideal for technical support and product/QA teams.
❌ But Jira isn't for everyone. It requires a certain methodological rigour and can quickly become too technical for non-dev teams:
- steep learning curve for beginners or non-technical teams ;
- dense interface, sometimes too busy for simple uses;
- less suitable for 'general public' collaboration (marketing, design, HR, etc.);
- complex implementation and configuration without a dedicated administrator;
- risk of over-customisation: the more you do, the harder it becomes to maintain.
Asana vs Jira: compare features
These two project management tools are powerful, but they weren't designed for the same contexts. Asana focuses on simplicity and collaboration, while Jira aims for structured technical execution. We'll help you see clearly by comparing the essential features.
| Functionality | Asana | Jira |
| Tasks and sub-tasks | Yes, simple and hierarchical | Yes, highly structured via tickets |
| Kanban / Scrum / List / Timeline view | Multiple native views | Scrum & Kanban customisable |
| Sprints / Backlog / Epics | ❌ Not native (possible with integration) | Natively integrated |
| Automations | Simple, using rules | Advanced, customisable |
| Customised workflows | ⚠️ Limited | Ultra comprehensive |
| Reporting / Dashboard | Simple dashboard | Advanced agile reporting |
| Collaboration (comments, mentions) | Very fluid | Present, but more formal |
| Integrated documentation | ❌ Depends on Notion/Google Docs | ❌ Depends on Confluence (Atlassian integrated) |
| Third-party integrations | Slack, Zoom, GDrive, Notion, etc. | GitHub, Bitbucket, Figma, Slack, etc. |
| APIs and extensions | API + Zapier/Make | API + Atlassian Marketplace |
Focus on task and ticket management
👉 Asana lets you:
- create tasks and sub-tasks,
- assign them,
- comment on them,
- classify them,
- move between projects.
Everything is designed to ensure smooth collaboration: information is clear, responsibilities visible and the structure logical. Perfect for teams who want to move fast without getting lost in the complexity.
👉 Jira is based on a much richer ticket logic: each element (bug, feature, improvement...) is a ticket:
- traceable
- categorisable
- assignable,
- modifiable.
The level of detail is extreme: history, activity log, SLA, etc. Indispensable for dev, product or support teams who need traceability and technical rigour.
Focus on agile methods
👉 Asana offers Kanban or chronological views, but does not natively manage sprints, backlogs, story points or burndown charts. These features are accessible via third-party integrations or by tinkering with templates.
Sufficient for "light" or hybrid agile teams, but not designed for pure Scrum.
👉 Jira is built for agility:
- Scrum,
- Kanban,
- product backlog,
- user stories,
- epics,
- story points,
- velocity,
- sprint planning...
It's all there, with integrated agile reporting tools. Teams can plan, execute and analyse continuously. The benchmark tool for mature, structured agile teams.
Focus on automation and workflows
👉 Asana's automations are simple and effective: "if such and such an action, then such and such a result" (e.g. assign a task when another is complete). All without code, via a clear interface. Ideal for saving time without complexity.
Good for simple or average workflows, with few advanced options.
👉 Jira lets you create complex workflows, with :
- customised states,
- conditional transitions
- approvals
- and scripts.
Automation can be applied to every stage of a ticket, with fine-grained business logic. A monster of customisation, provided you have the technical resources to exploit it.
Asana vs Jira: compare prices
Here's a price comparison table for Asana vs Jira, based on official prices available in September 2025.
| Plan | Asana | Jira |
| Free |
|
|
| Basic / Starter | Starter - €9.37 / user / month
|
Standard: €7.75 / user / month
|
| Intermediate / Advanced / Premium | Advanced - €21.30 / month
|
Premium: €14.63 / user / month
|
| Enterprise / on quotation | Enterprise - bespoke
|
Company: on quotation
|
Asana vs Jira: which interface is more intuitive?
| Criterion | Asana | Jira |
| Easy to use | Very accessible, even without training | ⚠️ More technical learning curve |
| General ergonomics | Modern, clear interface | ⚠️ Dense, sometimes too busy visually |
| Customisation | Customisable but guided views | Highly customisable workflows and views |
| Mobile accessibility | Fluid app on iOS / Android | ⚠️ Correct but a little more complex |
| Overall user experience | Fluid, intuitive, suitable for a variety of teams | ⚠️ Solid but requires some rigour |
💡 Verdict:
- Asana takes the lead in accessibility,
- Jira in power.
Asana vs Jira: compare integrations
The better a solution integrates with your SaaS stack, the more it becomes a central lever in your daily workflow. Whether you use Slack, Google Workspace, GitHub or Salesforce, a tool's ability to fit easily into your environment can make all the difference.
For IT managers, project managers or product teams, there are three criteria that count:
- the volume of integrations available
- the ease of connection
- and the power of automation.
👉 Number of integrations available
- Asana: ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆
Over 200 native integrations via the Asana App Directory. Out-of-the-box connections with Google Drive, Slack, Zoom, Notion, Salesforce, Microsoft Teams, Zapier, etc. Asana covers the marketing, product and collaboration worlds very well.
- Jira: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Over 3,000 extensions via the Atlassian Marketplace. Deep integrations with GitHub, Bitbucket, Figma, Jenkins, Confluence, AWS, Azure DevOps, and much more. It's one of the richest catalogues on the software development side.
👉 Ease of configuration
- Asana: ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆
The majority of integrations are plug & play. Installation takes just a few clicks via the interface or via Zapier for advanced automation. Little technical complexity. Ideal for non-technical teams.
- Jira: ⭐⭐☆☆☆
More technical. Some integrations require admin rights or an understanding of Jira workflows. Configuration can be complex if you push the business logic. A good Atlassian administrator is often essential.
👉 Customisation and automation
- Asana: ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆
Allows you to trigger simple rules between integrations: notify on Slack, move a task, assign automatically, etc. The interface is very accessible, but remains limited for complex logic.
- Jira: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
The automation possibilities are virtually unlimited: synchronisation between tickets, scripts, API calls, conditional notifications, cross-updates... Jira is a real orchestration engine for technical teams.
💡 Conclusion:
- Asana is ideal if you're looking for an out-of-the-box solution that's easy to connect to your day-to-day tools without any headaches ;
- Jira, on the other hand, excels in complex architectures, where functional depth and integration with the dev chain are priorities.
When should you choose Asana or Jira?
Choosing between Asana and Jira doesn't just depend on functionality. The right tool is the one that matches your team, your working method and your daily objectives.
Typical use cases for Asana
Asana is designed for teams looking for clarity, simplicity and speed of implementation. It's perfect for dynamic environments where collaboration between departments is essential.
🎯 Best if your priority is cross-departmental coordination:
- managing marketing campaigns with shared deadlines ;
- monitoring event-based projects or product launches;
- organising product roadmaps (without a heavy technical backlog);
- planning content for social networks or SEO;
- collaboration between marketing, design, HR and support teams, etc. ;
- tracking internal requests (via Asana forms);
- rapid implementation of projects with few technical resources.
Typical use cases for Jira
Jira is the preferred choice for development teams, technical PMs and organisations where workflows need to be rigorously monitored. It is designed to manage complex projects with numerous dependencies.
💡 Best used if your projects are structured, iterative or critical:
- management of agile sprints for developers (Scrum, Kanban) ;
- tracking bugs, tickets and changes in a centralised backlog;
- orchestration of product or software development cycles;
- DevOps coordination with Git, CI/CD and pipeline integration;
- technical reporting (velocity, burndown, SLA, workload per team);
- implementation of complex workflows with internal approvals;
- customer or IT support management with automated routing of requests.
Asana or Jira: make the right choice for the way you work
As we've seen throughout this comparison: Asana and Jira are two powerful project management tools ... but radically different in their approach.
👉 Asana focuses on simplicity, visual collaboration and flexibility of use, without imposing a rigid methodological framework. Choose Asana if:
- you work in a non-technical team,
- need flexibility, multiple views, and an out-of-the-box tool.
👉 Jira, on the other hand, is a war machine for technical teams, cut out for agile methods, advanced reporting and structured processes. Choose Jira if :
- you manage software development projects,
- follow sprints
- use Git/Bitbucket
- or need a structured, traceable workflow.
FAQ : Asana vs Jira
Asana or Jira: which is easier to use?
Asana is much easier to learn. It's suitable for all profiles, including non-technical ones, with a fluid interface, visual views (list, Kanban, calendar) and easy automation.
Jira is more complex: it requires a minimum of configuration, especially if you want to use its workflows or agile reporting.
Is it possible to manage sprints in Asana in the same way as in Jira?
No, Asana does not natively manage sprints, story points or backlogs like Jira. It is possible to simulate them using templates or integrations, but Jira remains the benchmark for agile management.
👉 For serious Scrum or Kanban teams, Jira is much better suited.
Which tool should you choose for a non-technical team?
Asana is more appropriate. It's designed for marketing, product, HR or cross-functional teams, with an intuitive interface and features geared towards collaboration and productivity.
Jira may be suitable, but its approach is more technical and rigid.
Can Jira and Asana be integrated together?
Yes, there are connectors between Jira and Asana via Zapier, Make or native Atlassian integrations. This makes it possible, for example, to synchronise Jira tickets with Asana projects, which is useful if your tech and product teams use different tools.
Which is better suited to managing multiple teams or projects?
Both can manage multiple projects and teams, but :
- Asana is better for cross-team coordination (thanks to its shared views and centralised information) ;
- Jira is more suitable if you're managing several technical teams with distinct workflows, well-defined roles and complex dependencies.
Article translated from French